| IMPROVING INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR EARLY WARNING
Adequate institutional set ups and practices are critical to address and strengthen the links between early warning and early action. The effective prevention of violent conflict requires a solid and mainstreamed capacity to analyse, anticipate, monitor as well as a political will to respond to the drivers of potential conflicts as early as possible. Even when one institution has the capacity to deliver on each of these requirements, it also needs to ensure that they are well articulated and ultimately contribute to a similar objective which should be to prevent a conflict to resurge or to break out by responding in an appropriate and meaningful way.
More than being the world’s biggest aid donor, the EU has gradually shown its willingness to become a global player. The development of a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the deployment of EU operations, the adoption of a EU Programme for the Prevention of Violent Conflicts (2001) and of the Council Conclusions on a EU response to situations of fragility (2007) are some of the milestones which endow the EU with a stronger role in preventing and responding to conflict. However, in spite of this growing engagement, failures to prevent genocides, violent conflicts and countries slipping into fragile situations, there is a need to challenge the impediments and to support the good practices to improve the EU’s early warning and response capabilities.
The cluster partners will therefore analyse the institutional aspects of EU early warning and assess the extent to which they are applied in-country and in Brussels to inform policies, strategies and programming processes. The objective of this collective work is to identify recommendations to overcome challenges and constraints so that the EU, under the new Lisbon Treaty architecture, can better link early warning to effective & timely response to prevent conflict and build peace. The focal countries of this cluster include Armenia, Bolivia, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Sri Lanka, Sudan and Venezuela.
The If-EW partners collaborating in this work are The Netherlands Institute of International Relations (‘Clingendael’), La Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), International Alert (Alert), University of Coimbra’s Peace Study group (NEP/CES) and Saferworld (SW) .
|
|